Did we reach the population s we aimed at? This approach is also known as consultation, empowerment, joint decision-making, democratic leadership, Management By Objective MBO and power-sharing.
Did we set up and run the project within the timelines and other structures that we intended? Evaluation actually needs to be an integral part of any project from the beginning.
And a broader solution means more, and more complex, evaluation questions. Is that still better than not eating the healthy foods? Respecting individuals and the knowledge and skills they have will go a long way toward promoting long-term trust and involvement.
There are really a number of potential disadvantages here. By the same token, there are many training methods, any or all of which might be useful with a particular group. This is particularly true in relation to evaluation.
To those who have taken part in evaluation before, the opportunity to exchange ideas with people who may have new ways of looking at the familiar can lead to a fresh perspective on what may have Participative evolution to be a settled issue. Did it Participative evolution other, unforeseen effects?
Did we have the community support we expected? In some situations, it makes the most sense to put out a general call for volunteers; in others, to approach specific individuals who are likely - because of their commitment to the project or to the population - to be willing.
Some basic guidelines for recruitment include: Framing is important in this activity as well. Developing a theory of practice to address the problem How do you conduct a community effort so that it has a good chance of solving the problem at hand?
Others whose lives are affected by the project. One comprises finding and training stakeholders to act as participant evaluators. Did we have or get the resources we expected? This might be a single program or initiative, or a coordinated, community-wide effort involving several organizations, the media, and individuals.
They may work directly with project beneficiaries as mentors, teachers, or health care providers; or they may advocate for immigrant rights, identify open space to be preserved, or answer the phone and stuff envelopes.
That may be a specific group people with a certain medical condition, for instancea particular population recent Southeast Asian immigrants, residents of a particular areaor a whole community.
When you have the time, or when results are more important than time. Avant Urbanism This practice suggests we open urban planning so that citizens can contribute to its development.
Did our work have the effects we hoped for? When you need information that it will be difficult for anyone outside the community or population to get. Even if the leaders are good representatives of the group, you may want to broaden your recruitment in the hopes of developing more community leadership, and empowering those who may not always be willing to speak out.
Another is the question of what kind of training participants will respond to.
In fact, it may be one of the more difficult aspects of conducting a participatory evaluation. It teaches skills that can be used in employment and other areas of life. How you handle this question will depend on the attitudes of those involved, how many people you actually have to draw on if the recruitment of the initial team was really difficult, you may not have a lot of choicesand what people committed to.
In addition to the development of basic skills and specific research capabilities, participatory evaluation encourages critical thinking, collaboration, problem-solving, independent action, meeting deadlines How do you conduct a participatory evaluation?
Did we use the methods we set out to use?Evolution of Leadership Theories is a comprehensive study of leadership trends over the years, and in various contexts and theoretical foundations. This study presents. An Open Source neighbourhood: the participative evolution of cities October 23, by Faena Aleph.
Posted in: Avant Urbanism.
This practice suggests we open urban planning so that citizens can contribute to its development. Participative leadership is a style of leadership that involves all members of a team in identifying essential goals and developing procedures or strategies for reach those goals.
Organization Transformation (OT) OT tends to use directive approaches to change rather than participative. It requires a clear, shared vision, a willingness to change, a wiliness to clean house, to reengineer and restructure, and the ability to tackle many problems.
Autocratic participative decision-making implies that while possible solutions are brainstormed collectively, the responsibility of taking the final decision is still on the leader alone. Autocratic leadership style allows the organization to benefit from the collective input provided by all employees while making decisions reasonably fast.
Participative leadership attempts to permit employees to contribute in the decision making of matters that directly affect them. Permitting employees' participation in what are traditionally management decisions finds support in the humanistic view, the idea of power sharing and in organizational efficiency.Download