Hyperlinks are not really the problem when you think about it critically. We have come to believe Google has all the answers, therefore, we do not make the extra effort of doing thorough research. Nicholas Carr is giving voice to these concerns. Although the Internet is a forum through which a variety of individuals can express their viewpoints and ideas, they derive said expression from certain sources.
This, therefore, makes us argue that there is a chance that Google is actually making us smarter. Finally, Carr places his skepticism in a historical context, reflecting upon how previous detractors of technological advances have fared.
Towards the end of the article it becomes clear that he wants readers to believe that it is not a good thing. To me, emotions seems to be a more complex idea than just thinking, or at least on the same level as the way we understand and process information.
Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. They Nicholas carr google essay our lives easier but it comes at a cost. I would argue that, in a sense, we are losing our individuality in the Internet. When things are shortened and boiled down to their simplest elements, they lose their complexities and nuances.
According to Ben Worthen, a Wall Street Journal business technology blogger, the growing importance placed on the ability to access information instead of the capacity to recall information straight from memory would, in the long term, change the type of job skills that companies who are hiring new employees would find valuable.
His claim that the Internet changes our way of thinking by changing our expectations on what we read falls a little flat without his or the authority of his friends being made known.
Instead, we are quick to turn to Google for answers. He acknowledges that his argument does not yet have the backing of long-term neurological and psychological studies. I think that the mental discipline we derive from deciphering and interpreting a text is incredibly important and we are beginning to lose that practice.
One point does stand out, over 30 years, new technologies have been introduced that have rendered us incapable of critical thinking and reading. Although this has allowed for a lot of positive developments, I agree with Carr that this ideal can definitely be taken too far.
Eden, director of the Center for the Study of Learning at Georgetown Universityremarked that the question was whether or not the Internet changed the brain in a way that was beneficial to an individual. Google does not make us stupid".
His blog is well worth reading regularly: Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski. As Carr points out, we are likely to read material that has been handwritten compared to typed work. Anyone can quote their friends, but the friends of a well known author are probably more reliable than the friends of a high school student.
We have traded our gained intelligence for the superficiality of the internet.
Our concerns are about the qualitative differences in how net-gen students think and write and learn. I think that the notion of increased efficiency and conciseness is even more pervasive in modern society. Like what you read? Drawing parallels with transactive memory — a process whereby people remember things in relationships and groups — Ratliff mused that perhaps the web was "like a spouse who is around all the time, with a particular knack for factual memory of all varieties".
This is because of our reduced attention span and critical thinking. The truth is, every activity that we engage in affects our brain in one way or another. Early in his article, Carr describes the way the Internet has specifically affected his thought processes.
According to German scholar Friedrich A. Instead of thoughtfully mapping out my ideas and arguments, I jot down bullet points with my strings of thought and try to patch them together afterwards. He is a skilled writer and is widely read. Is Google making us stupid makes us question our freedom.
The notion that the evolution of human thought is tied so closely to specific channels and interests is hard to grapple with. This shift was examined for its potential to lead individuals to a superficial comprehension of many subjects rather than a deep comprehension of just a few subjects.
He saves this argument for last because he wants to make the audience feel fear. Although Shirky acknowledged that the unprecedented quantity of written material available on the web might occasion a sacrifice of the cultural importance of many works, he believed that the solution was "to help make the sacrifice worth it".
Carr in thinking that an over-reliance on internet tools will inevitably cause the brain to atrophy, and Cascio in thinking that getting smarter is the necessary outcome of the evolutionary pressures he describes.Is Google Making Us Stupid?, The Atlantic The Internet Rewards the Lazy and Punishes the Intrepid, Guardian What Google Wants Is to Condemn Microsoft to the Electric Chair.
Essay about Summary of "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr Words | 4 Pages. Summary of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr As the internet offers us the benefits of quick and easy knowledge, it is affecting the brain’s capacity to read longer articles and books.
! 1! Is Google Making Us Stupid? Nicholas Carr What the Internet is doing to our brains "Dave, stop. Stop, will you? Stop, Dave. Will you stop, Dave?”. Nicholas Carr's essay "Is Google Making Us Stupid?," is a reflection on the negative influences which Google and the Internet have on.
Is Google Making Us Stupid? A few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I’ve got the telltale fact or pithy quote I was after.
Nicholas Carr is an important voice today in pointing to the nervousness that many people have about technology.
He recently published The Big Switch; Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google, which is in its seventh printing.Download