In Defense of Animal Research Few defenses of the utility of animal research go beyond exhaustive lists of success stories, and few critiques go beyond listing failures. Animal experimentation contributed to the discoveries and theories documented in this body of work.
CRC Press,; E. He also studied the form and function of everything he examined to gain an understanding and compare each creature. Unfortunately, mouse stem cells have been better at repairing damaged mouse hearts in the laboratory than have human stem cells in human clinical trials.
As a veterinarian, he specializes in the care of laboratory animals and has specialty certification with the American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. I do not defend the morality of using animals in experiments, nor do I review the alternatives and refinements that can minimize laboratory animal suffering, which remains an active area for inquiry and discussion.
Replacement refers to the substitution of animals with other techniques to perform research that will produce similar results. An enormous concern is about what we miss by overreliance on animal models.
Thalidomide, rofecoxib Vioxxand other drugs caused human health problems after having been tested on animals; these apparent failures do not show that animal research is useless. But that concern surely applies to overreliance on any of the research methodologies mentioned here, and even to the interwoven edifice of multidisciplinary research.
The root of his research was based on observation and reasoning. These texts are timeless and contain an immense quantity of information. As a monkey vet, I may go beyond the monkey medicine books and look to the available information on dogs, as well as to the advice of my colleagues who practice human medicine.
Animals are chosen to model some aspect of human biology. Human livers favor sulfation, though not exclusively. My entire career has relied on applying what we know about one species of animal to the care of another.
In other words, some animals must be sufficiently different from humans in morally relevant ways to allow the morality of speciesism, and some animals must be sufficiently similar to humans biologically for cross-species extrapolation to have utility.
The benefits of this exploratory research do not outweigh the suffering that these powerless animals have encountered since the beginning of time. His book, What Animals Want: Springer,Animal Experimentation: A Necessary Evil It is time for society to realize that no one benefits from the suffering of animals used in expensive and useless experiments/5(1).
Essay on Animal Research: A Necessary Evil. ethical to use animals for experimentation. When considering whether animal research is ethically acceptable or not two main concerns must be raised.
IELTS Writing Task 2: 'animal testing' essay. but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned. In conclusion, it has been proven that animal research should not be stopped, but what I believe that it should be carried out for necessary research.
Animal Research: A Necessary Evil Essay - It has long been debated as to whether it is ethical to use animals for experimentation. When considering whether animal research is ethically acceptable or not two main concerns must be raised.
The Institute for Laboratory Animal Research of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences argues that even sophisticated computers are unable to model interactions between molecules, cells, tissues, organs, organisms and the environment, as well as animals, making animal research necessary in many areas.
For animal research that causes sentient nonhuman animal suffering to be justifiable, I believe that two conditions must be met. First, harming animals for human benefit must be morally justified; this is the speciesism justification.
Second, animal research must have utility—that is, it must produce useful, empirically valid knowledge that successfully .Download